Sports

Qatari activs criticize own government over Tel Aviv-Doha World Cup flights

A group of Qatari activs campaigning against normalising ties with Israel have said they are shocked that their government has authorised direct flights between Tel Aviv and Doha during the soccer World Cup.
The protest – Qatar Youth Against Normalization, a vocal group of 24 members, mostly Qataris – was small but notable in a state where citizens very rarely speak out against authorities. “It has come as a shock to us that days leading to the World Cup, Qatar has entered new territories of normalization with the announcement that direct flights will now operate between apartheid Israel and Doha,” the group said late on Thursday.
There was no immediate response to requests for comment sent to Qatar’s government communications office, World Cup organizers the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy or FIFA, soccer’s world governing body.
FIFA said on Thursday it brokered the deal between Qatar and Israel, which do not hold formal diplomatic ties, to facilitate the attendance of eligible Israeli and Palestinian fans at the World Cup, which runs from Nov. 20 to Dec 18. A Qatari official told Reuters on Thursday the agreement on flights did not change his country’s stance on Israel.

While Qatar’s Gulf neighbors the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain forged ties with Israel under U.S.-brokered pacts in 2020, Qatar has said normalization with Israel is linked to the creation of a Palestinian state. The agreement on flights “is part of Qatar’s commitment to FIFA’s hosting requirements and it should not be politicized,” the official said.
Palestinians, including those living in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, will be able to board Doha-bound flights at Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion airport, the Qatari official said. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken late on Thursday called the flight agreement “a horic development and an important step that also holds great promise to bolster people-to-people ties and economic relations”.

Related Articles

Back to top button