Trump’s 20% Hormuz cargo charge: What it means for India’s oil bill and trade | World News

President Donald Trump speaks after signing executive orders modifying the Bears Ears National Monument and the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in the Oval Office of the White House. (Photo: AP)

US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a 20 percent charge on all cargo transiting the Strait of Hormuz has raised fresh concerns for India, which sources a significant share of its crude oil and gas imports through the waterway, as the conflict between the US, Israel and Iran continues to spread across the Gulf.

Trump said on Monday that the US would reinstate a naval blockade of Iranian ports and impose a 20 percent levy on cargo passing through the strait, framing it as compensation for American forces securing the route. He said the charge would apply to “all other countries” except vessels linked to Iran, which would be barred entirely, with the blockade taking effect from 8pm GMT on Tuesday. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said the US was “hitting them very hard” and “controlling the strait,” while adding that a peace deal with Iran remained possible.

How did the tanker attack fit into this?

Hours before Trump’s announcement, the UAE said Iranian cruise missiles had struck two of its tankers, the Mombasa and Al Bahiyah, in the strait’s southern shipping lane within Omani territorial waters, killing one Indian crew member and injuring eight others, six of them Indian nationals and two Ukrainian, four seriously.

تعلن وزارة الدفاع عن تعرض الناقلتين الوطنيتين (ممباسا) و (الباهية) للاستهداف بصاروخين جوالين إيرانيين في الممر الجنوبي لمضيق هرمز بالمياه الإقليمية العمانية.وقد أسفر الاستهداف عن مقتل أحد أفراد طاقم الناقلة (ممباسا) من الجنسية الهندية، وإصابة 8 من بينهم 4 إصابات بليغة. (6 من… pic.twitter.com/KVz3qDu6kf— وزارة الدفاع |MOD UAE (@modgovae) July 13, 2026

The UAE’s Minry of Defence called it a “brazen attack” that violated international law and said the country reserves its right to respond.

How has Iran responded?

Iran’s foreign miner, Abbas Araghchi, responded to Trump’s blockade announcement writing on X that Tehran would remain the strait’s “guardian,” sarcastically agreeing that whoever secures the waterway should be compensated, while calling 20 percent “too much.”

POTUS is absolutely right. Whoever provides secure and safe passage of commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz should be compensated for this service. Iran has always been the GUARDIAN of the Strait and will remain so FOREVER.20% is of course too much. We will be fair— Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) July 13, 2026

Iran’s top military command separately said it would not allow the US to “interfere in the management” of the strait, warning that any US-linked cooperation would be treated as an act of war against Iranian sovereignty.

Is the charge legal?

The International Maritime Organization, the UN’s shipping regulator, said there is no legal basis for imposing mandatory tolls on transit through an international strait, a spokesperson told Reuters.Story continues below this ad

Why does this matter for India?

Before the conflict escalated in February, roughly a fifth of the world’s oil and a fifth of global liquefied natural gas moved through Hormuz a route India depends on heavily for Gulf energy supplies. A 20 percent surcharge, if enforced, would raise landed costs for Indian refiners and could eventually feed into domestic fuel prices, even as New Delhi has diversified toward discounted Russian crude in recent years to cushion Gulf-related shocks. The presence of six Indian nationals among Monday’s injured also underscores how exposed Indian seafarers are, given how large a share of Gulf-transiting crews are Indian nationals.

There has been no immediate statement from India’s Minry of External Affairs on either the tanker attack or the proposed cargo levy. The minry has issued advisories to Indian crews during earlier flare-ups in the strait and is likely to face questions on both fronts.

With Gulf-transiting vessels increasingly targeted and strait traffic already restricted, according to ship-tracking data, Indian oil marketing companies and shipping insurers are likely to face higher costs and route uncertainty in the near term. Trump’s move could also be politically complicated at home, with oil prices ticking up again despite earlier assurances, and some Republican lawmakers already questioning the value of the now-fraying ceasefire.

(With inputs from BBC, Reuters)