Business

Union Budget 2017: Did Jaitley just prove his critics right on corporate tax exemptions?

In his February 2015 Budget speech, Arun Jaitley earned much praise for declaring that the government would, over a period of three years, phase out various tax exemptions for the corporate sector and at the same time bring down the corporate tax rate to 25 percent from the prevailing 30 percent. Of course, it did earn him brickbats from those who focussed only on the reduction in tax rates and conveniently airbrushed what he said about this being accompanied by a withdrawal of exemptions.

Two years on, are the critics right? Has Jaitley focussed more on reducing rates than on withdrawing exemptions?

Those who feel corporate tax exemptions are also subsidies, will say Jaitley has done more of the former. They will quote the rise and rise of revenue foregone due to exemptions. Revenue foregone in the case of corporate tax rose from Rs 76,858 crore in 2015-16 to Rs 83,492 in 2016-17. In the case of indirect taxes (customs and excise), revenue foregone increased from Rs 1,48,442 crore to Rs 1,54,822 crore over the same period. (The revenue foregone on account of personal income tax is also a sizeable sum, but does not attract the criticism that corporate tax and indirect tax exemptions do).

But what of the charge that Jaitley is not doing enough on withdrawing exemptions?

That Jaitley was not just making an empty promise was evident when, in November 2015, the finance ministry unveiled a roadmap for withdrawal of exemptions.

According to this report, profit-linked, investment-linked and area-based tax deductions were to be phased out for both corporate and non-corporate tax payers, the sunset date of existing exemptions were not to be extended, where there was no terminal date, a sunset date of 31 March 2017 was to be set for claim of benefit and no weighted deduction was to be allowed after 1 April 2017.

Budget 2016-17 kick-started the process. Several deductions were reduced and sunset dates put for others along with reductions in tax rates for some categories of businesses – new manufacturing companies set up after March 2016 were given the option of being taxed at 25 percent provided they did not claim any exemption and companies with turnover less than Rs 5 crore got a 1 percent reduction. However, some new exemptions were given to start-ups, with certain conditions.

This year, admittedly, Jaitley has not moved forward on withdrawing exemptions even as he reduced corporate tax rates.

But let’s look at who has got this benefit: the small and medium enterprises sector. Income tax for companies with an annual turnover of up to Rs 50 crore has been brought down to 25 percent. A big chunk of this lot was paying an effective tax rate of 30.26 percent, while the large companies (turnover above Rs 500 crore) paid an effective tax rate of 25.9 percent. So Jaitley has in a way done the tax equivalent of social levelling. Large companies have not got any tax relief this year.

Was pressing the pause button on withdrawal of exemptions warranted? Let’s not forget that taking the axe to exemptions this year would not have been a good idea, considering the slowdown the economy is going through. At the same time, the business group most adversely affected by demonetisation – the small and medium enterprises – have got substantial relief.

What of the way forward?

There’s no getting away from the fact that tax exemptions have to go. They are a drain on the exchequer and they also are the main source of disputes, especially on corporate tax. Amounts under dispute in the case of corporate tax saw a 32 percent increase between 2014-15 and 2015-16. This clearly has to end. How the withdrawals are sequenced and calibrated is the key.

An abrupt withdrawal of exemptions already given and being enjoyed is not an option. The business models of companies, which would have factored that in, will go for a toss. If a company had started operations in 2013 on the basis of a ten-year tax holiday, would it be fair to say the tax break will end in 2019? So the finance ministry will have to continue with putting in sunset clauses where there are none and resisting lobbying to extend the life of those that are nearing an end. To that extent, withdrawal of tax concessions will be a gradual affair.

Equally important is to do a cost-benefit analysis of existing exemptions and, if they are not found to be serving the purpose, work with industry to phase them out as quickly as possible. When special economic zones (SEZ) have not really taken off in the way they were expected to, is there any point in continuing with deduction of profits of companies engaged in developing them? The revenue lost on this account was Rs 2,118 crore in 2016-17.

The temptation to give tax sops to encourage new sectors or entrepreneurship also has to be resisted. Last year, Jaitley gave tax sops to start-ups – 100 percent deduction of profits for three out of five years, no tax on capital gains with certain conditions. This year, the deduction of profits has been relaxed to three out of seven years and the conditions relating to no tax on capital gains has also been eased.

As Sunil Sinha, principal economist, India Ratings, points out, putting too many ifs and buts to tax concessions makes them cumbersome to administer and also give more scope for disputes. Perhaps the government can start with doing away with conditions, as a precursor to doing away with exemptions.

The problem of exemptions in indirect taxes will be more or less taken care of with the coming of the goods and services tax regime. But what of direct taxes? Sinha makes a pithy point when notes that while this government has been tom-tomming its GST push, there is hardly any talk about a direct tax code; that seems to have been buried with the United Progressive Alliance government. A simple and straightforward direct tax code with minimum exemptions (if any, at all) would go a long way to ending disputes and reducing revenue loss. Will Jaitley make a start on this in the coming year?

You can also use, like a light yarn, you know, you’d find at a craft store to put telltales on. So, for a small jib like this we’re going to do two sets of telltales. One about. We’re going to divide the luff into about thirds. We’re going to put one set right about here and another set just above this seam. Over the next two months, leading up to his inauguration as the nation 45th president, Donald Trump and his transition team will be hiring thousands of people about a thousand of whom must be confirmed by the Senate. You can find CBS News previous blog on the transition here, and we have the latest on what going on with the presidential transition below:One example: A Portland, Oregon news site went on a frenzy calling an upcoming winter storm “Winter Blast.” The result? According to this site, Portland got two inches of snow. For the entire month of December. Holy Shit, two inches! Why that’s enough snow cheap oakleys to build a four inch tall snowman, then look at pathetic said snowman, think of your childhood and wonder if you’ll ever be able to feel anything ever again.The process of natural selection can takes tens (and in some cases, hundreds) of thousands of years to take place in humans. But this isn’t the case for MRSA and some other bugs. As Fake Oakleys Sale the Mayo Clinic put it, MRSA and other bacteria “live on an evolutionary fast track” [source: Mayo Clinic]. Rather than taking thousands of years to develop into their current lethal strain, MRSA has evolved and spread in mere decades. In 1974, MRSA infections cheap jordans made up two percent of all staph infections. By 2004, MRSA accounted for 63 percent [source: CDC]. What’s worse is that this bug has been shown to be fatal in some cases, especially when it remains untreated.After looking like a bust during his first couple years in Charlotte, Biyombo had a breakout postseason with the Raptors last season once starting center Jonas Valanciunas went down with an Wholesale NFL Jerseys ankle injury. Biyombo’s defense and rebounding helped keep the Raptors afloat in Eastern Conference Replica ray ban Sunglasses sale Finals against the Cavaliers, making him a candidate cheap oakleys sunglasses to earn a $14 million raise from his $2.9 million 2015 16 salary according to Sean Deveney of the Sporting News. While Boston’s frontcourt could use his rebounding and rim protection, he doesn’t provide the offensive firepower (7.9 points per 36 minutes over hiscareer) and floor spacing the Celtics would need for that kind of money.Drew Wholesale NFL Jerseys Online Brees is 2 7 in his career against the Broncos, his worst record against any opponent he’s faced at least five times; he has only five TD passes in those nine starts against Denver. In his last six home games overall, Brees has 18 TD passes, two interceptions, an average of 380.3 yards per game, and a 114.1 rating.
I noted at the time that the hashtag was “proof that there are two America: One that gets off with a wink. And one that just gets offed.”In that other America, white versions of Martin, Brown and Garner might well have gotten the chance to “make good” like Wahlberg; they might be the ones seeking to redeem their youthful indiscretions. One other amazing fact: In the NCFL, the National Coin Flip League, when a regulation coin flipping contest (or a “Glimity” in the strange terminology of the sport) goes into overtime (or as they call it “susicivus temous”) the contestants settle the tie by engaging in a game of tackle football. Replica Air Jordans Who knew?Because of to the high expectations placed on the team by owner Bud Adams along with the salary cap issues facing the team following the 93 season, Jack Pardee named Cody Carlson as the starting quarterback for cheap nfl jerseys the Oilers week 7 game against the New England Patriots. The benching of Warren Moon was viewed by some as a way for Pardee to take some of the heat off himself. As for being benched, Warren Moon understandably expressed disappointment with the decision.So you might get the impression that it’s an entirely apples to Cheap Ray Bans Sale oranges or pork barrel to pigskin comparison. But there is at least one area of significant overlap, according to Feely. Coming from Feely, a self described fiscal conservative who appears on the Sean Hannity Show to discuss what he sees as America’s burgeoning economic and educational crisis, it’s somewhat surprising.Subscribe to USA TODAYAlready a print edition subscriber, but don’t have a login?Activate your digital access.Manage your account settings. ET Aug. ET Aug. 26, 2015Roger Goodell wasn’t in court on Wednesday, but still got zinged by a judge.(Photo: Kyle Terada, USA TODAY)MINNEAPOLIS The federal judge who long has presided over NFL labor matters is as interested as everyone else to see how things play out in the Tom Brady Deflategate case. Break the team up into smaller groups of four to six people. Give each person a sheet of paper and instruct them to write down two statements on the paper that are not true about their lives and one statement that is true. Provide a few minutes for everyone to write down their three statements. Once everyone completes their statements, have each person in the group share their statements. The listeners work together to identify which statement is true. This game allows team members to learn interesting facts about one another.Every bruise, wound, injury or fracture follows a set pattern while healing. It is necessary to understand this pattern in order to be familiar with the various stages that your injury or fracture will cheap nfl jerseys go through. Each stage is discount football jerseys characterized by a specific activity that aids in recuperation. The time for completion of each stage differs with the severity of the injury and the age of the patient; the sequence, however, remains the same.

Related Articles

Back to top button