Wave of terrorism in Israel defies a clear narrative

The current surge in terror attacks in Israel has been framed Palestinian parties and militant groups as a logical consequence of the entrenchment of Israel’s 55-year occupation of the West Bank, of Israel’s control over sensitive religious sites in Jerusalem, and of the dwindling commitment from some key Arab leaders to the creation of a Palestinian state.
The attackers’ diverse backgrounds, however, have left both Palestinian and Israeli analysts and officials uncertain about the relationship between the assailants, their respective motivations and the timing of their attacks.
In the deadliest wave of violence since 2016, there have been four attacks in four Israeli cities since March 22, involving five Arab assailants who have killed 14 people, including two Arab police officers and two Ukrainians. But beyond their lethal outcomes, the four episodes do not fit easily within a simple narrative.
The two most recent attacks — in Tel Aviv and Bnei Brak — were carried out Palestinians from the occupied West Bank. While praised several Palestinian movements, no group has formally claimed responsibility for them.
The two earlier attacks were carried out three members of Israel’s Arab minority who had known sympathies for the Islamic State group, the extrem group that has no ties to the Palestinian national movement and that claimed responsibility, perhaps opportunically, for one incident but not the other.
While the lethal outcome of the first attack, on March 22, may have inspired the others to follow suit, a senior Israeli military officer said there was currently no evidence that any of them were masterminded a major Palestinian group, let alone the same network. Analysts also noted that the attackers in the first two incidents had no ideological connection to the latest two.
“I honestly don’t think they’re the same thing at all,” said Bashaer Fahoum-Jayoussi, chair of the board of the Abraham Initiatives, a nongovernmental group that promotes equality between Israel’s Jewish and Palestinian citizens. “There are huge differences between the profiles of these people.”
Through their support for a Pan-Arab caliphate, Fahoum-Jayoussi said, three attackers set themselves apart not only from the Palestinian cause but also from the grievances of Israel’s Arab minority. Roughly 20% of the Israeli population is Arab, most descending from Palestinians who remained in Israel after its founding in 1948 and who still seek more rights and recognition within the Jewish state.
contrast, the motives of the two West Bank Palestinians “have more to do with the occupation and the injustices that they’re going through, not that that justifies anything,” said Fahoum-Jayoussi, a Palestinian citizen of Israel.
“But why now?” she added. “What has changed exactly at this time?”
To some, the timing of the violence is hardly a surprise, and was even long foretold.
Next weekend, the religious festivals of Passover, Ramadan and Easter will overlap in a rare convergence that will drive unusually high numbers of Jewish, Muslim and Chrian worshippers to the Old City of Jerusalem. That raises the risk of confrontations between Muslims and Jews and heightens long-standing Palestinian resentment about the restrictions on access to and control of the Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.
While groups like Hamas, the militant Islam movement based in Gaza, have released several recent statements inciting against Israel and praising the wave of terrorism, Israeli officials do not believe the group is currently seeking to organize its own operations, according to the senior Israeli military officer, speaking on the condition of anonymity to comply with Israeli military protocol.
Given this context, the specific timing of the violence has perplexed experienced analysts, even if they agree that the inherent instability of life in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza always makes violence possible.
Whoever “has identified a pattern or a reason to explain ‘why now’ and ‘why this way’ is just hallucinating,” said Ehud Yaari, a prominent Israeli analyst of Palestinian affairs. “The most important element is how random it is,” he added.
But to many Palestinians, the structural reasons behind the violence are obvious, even if these specific attacks and their perpetrators lack a clear unifying narrative.
Although Israel’s recent piecemeal concessions to Palestinians have improved life in small ways, the most fundamental Palestinian aspiration — a sovereign state — remains remote. The Israeli prime miner, Naftali Bennett, opposes Palestinian sovereignty and has ruled out peace negotiations during his tenure.
Bennett’s government has announced that it will construct thousands of new buildings within Israeli settlements in the West Bank, entrenching Israel’s 55-year occupation of the territory. It still maintains a two-tier legal system there — one for Palestinians and one for Israeli setters — and still restricts Palestinian movement within parts of it. With Egypt, Israel also still enforces a blockade on the Gaza Strip.
“For Israelis, the occupation is invisible,” said Nour Odeh, a Palestinian political analyst and a former spokesperson for the Palestinian Authority. But for Palestinians, “it’s a dead end everywhere you look,” she said.
“Of course, Palestinians will welcome improvements to their standards of living,” Odeh added. “But they’re not going to forget they’re occupied.”
A recent summit meeting in the Negev desert between four Arab foreign miners and their Israeli and American counterparts also exacerbated a feeling of hopelessness among many Palestinians.
The meeting was the first diplomatic gathering of so many Arab dignitaries on Israeli soil and was held near the grave of David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first prime miner. It was also near land central to a continuing ownership dispute between Bedouin families and the Israeli state — a case that, to young Palestinians, has become emblematic of their wider predicament.
For many Palestinians, this combination of factors made the meeting a scene of “absolute humiliation,” Odeh said. “I don’t think anyone in Palestine didn’t see those images and get angry.”
In addition, a small minority of young Palestinians may increasingly turn to violence because of their growing anger at the Palestinian leadership, analysts said.

Initially seen as the government of a state-in-waiting, the Palestinian Authority is now considered a majority of Palestinians, polling suggests, as a word for corruption.
The authority’s president, Mahmoud Abbas, is seen as increasingly autocratic. He canceled Palestinian elections last March, nominally because Israel would not permit Palestinians to vote in Jerusalem but also because, privately, he feared losing, according to people familiar with his thinking.
“The great majority of the younger generation have lost confidence in every Palestinian institution,” said Yaari, the analyst.
Young Palestinians see “that the Palestinian national struggle is going nowhere, and it’s led people that they don’t trust,” he added. “So some of them — not too many, but some of them — decide to take a revolver and do something with it.”