Trump sent military to ‘silence’ LA protests, says California as judge questions president’s authority on troop deployment | World News

The US government’s decision to deploy National Guard troops in Los Angeles to protect the officers carrying out the US President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown was an illegal move and it should be ended, said a lawyer of California state to a federal judge on Tuesday.
The landmark trial against the federal government began on Monday and California’s lawyer presented evidence that showed soldiers of Nationals Guard and Marines, deployed in Los Angeles in June the Trump adminration, violated a 19th century law that restricts the military from civilian law enforcement.
According to lawyer Meghan Strong of the California Attorney General’s Office, “The government wanted a show of military force so great that any opposition to their agenda was silenced,” Reuters reported.

He was just getting warmed up in Los Angeles.
He will gaslight his way into militarizing any city he wants in America.
This is what dictators do. https://t.co/IPvx9Hrp0q
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) August 11, 2025
Defending the federal government’s move, Justice Department attorney Eric Hamilton said that there was “substantial violence” in Los Angeles that merits the deployment of military and said that National Guard and Marines troops were in the city only to protect federal agents and property.
Story continues below this ad

In June, Trump had ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles in order to contain days of protests and unrest triggered mass immigration raids carried out the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
California Governor Gavin Newsom opposed the federal government’s move and alleged it violates prohibitions on the use of the military in law enforcement, while suing the Trump adminration.
US Drict Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco is hearing the arguments and has not revealed when he would rule in the matter. Breyer will determine whether the Trump adminration violated the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA).
A Reuters report stated that Judge Breyer appeared skeptical whether President Trump had the sole discretion to decide when troops were needed. “Is it a ‘rebellion’ because the president says it is a ‘rebellion’?” Breyer asked Justice Department’s attorney Hamilton during the government’s closing argument.