Hot NewsIndia

Indus Waters treaty: After Uri, Modi’s water offensive biggest threat to Pakistan in long term

Don’t be fooled by the official line that India took on Monday that it would stand by the infamous Indus Waters Treaty. If you read between lines, the very announcement that India would ignore Pakistan’s objections to three hydro-electric projects on Indus tributaries and go ahead with them in itself constitutes nothing short of a major water offensive by India.

The announcement, which came at the end of a meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had called to “review” the treaty, was designed to deliver a jolt to Pakistan. It did.
“India set to wage war against Pakistan,” screamed a headline in Tuesday’s edition of The Nation, a Pakistani newspaper.

Shireen Mazari, former journalist and leader of Pakistan-Tehreek-e-Insaf party, went to the extent of saying that India’s “suspension of the treaty” was the first step towards declaring (a real) war against Pakistan. Speaking in Pakistan’s National Assembly on Monday, she demanded an immediate response to India from Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

Indeed, what India says it intends to do now does not amount to abrogating the treaty but suspending it.
And don’t miss India’s announcement not to participate in the meetings of the Indus Water Commission. What India is telling Pakistan, in other words, is that it no longer respects the provisions of the treaty which demand that all matters related to projects on the sprawling Indus basin must be discussed at this forum once a year.
In the past, India did indeed suspend the Indus Commission talks. But this time, what adds a ring of menace to it is that it is accompanied by a threat to ignore Pakistan’s objections to India’s projects and proceed with them.

In any case, Pakistan has all along been accusing India of not strictly abiding by the treaty. The new measures that India announced only mean that India will not effectively abide by the treaty from now, though it says it will. So where does all this leave the treaty? In a limbo.

If the government’s talk on Monday wasn’t just empty rhetoric—there is no reason at least yet to believe it is—it will take about two years to harm Pakistan’s agricultural interests. If the government is serious about all this, it amounts to the first big threat Modi is making to the terror exporters across the border after the Uri attack.
In fact, it India takes it to the logical end, it would be the most substantial, calculated move that any recent Indian government has ever made against Pakistan. Modi’s new line that ‘blood and water can’t flow together’ is a clear deviation from his earlier soft theme of ‘attackers will be avenged’. This is Modi’s style of putting Pakistan on notice.

While the inter-ministerial commission that the government said would look into the issues related to water utilisation would take time to do that job, the announcement that India will work speedily on the Pakal Dul, Bursar and Sawalkot projects seemed to be categorical.

India will, of course, claim that it’s only using up its share of 20 per cent waters allocated to it by the treaty, a claim that will, no doubt, be hotly contested by Pakistan. Under the 1960 treaty signed between Jawaharlal Nehru and Pakistan President Ayub Khan, India conceded, as a “goodwill” gesture, 80 per cent of the water to Pakistan.
Both the 1,000 MW Pakal Dul hydel project on the Marusadar river, a tributary of the Chenab, and the 1,020 MW Bursar project on the Chenab that India spoke about on Monday will raise Pakistani hackles. These two are among the projects that Pakistan has been dead set against.

And the 1,200 MW Sawalkot project, much bigger than these two, will drive the Pakistanis up the wall even more. Pakistan has been saying that the proposed Sawalkot dam falls within the seismic zone of the Himalayas and would be highly vulnerable to earthquakes. Some experts across the border argue that Sawalkot would pose the threat of a huge environmental disaster for Pakistan.

And the Tulbul navigation project, which India had suspended and which it said on Monday would review, is designed to drive the Pakistanis into a state of paranoia. Pakistanis have been claiming that this project, apart from depriving them of water, would pose a serious security risk to them. According to them, the Tulbul project would help Indians manipulate the water level in the Jhelum, making it easy for them to cross the river in times of war. That also means, they claim, Indians can make it tough for the Pakistani soldiers to cross the river if they choose to.

So this is a water war by India—or at least the notice for waging one.
But what India’s own war hawks must understand now is that Modi’s well-thought-out water offensive, if carried out, will not produce quick results but will wreak unspeakable havoc on Pakistan in the long term.

how to reassemble an arOn the Lamarckian comments this is really well poisoning. The hypothesis here is not Lamarckian in an real meaningful sense of Fake Ray Bans the word. It is not valid to dismiss a new hypothesis solely on the grounds that in a very limited way, and entirely coincidentally, they overlap with the bogus theories of a crank from a century ago. (It would hardly be the first time that politically or ideologically motivated nonsense has turned out to overlap in such a superficial and coincidental way with scientific fact; 17th century puritanical rejections of smoking, to take a very simple example).The Chargers anticipated that the task force would choose the Mission Valley location. People who run downtown San Diego hotels are not supportive of a stadium in their immediate neighborhood. There are two major reasons. First, those hotel managers favor a contiguous convention center, as opposed to a convention center in one spot and a stadium down the street. And second, if the convention center and stadium were to be combined, they say, that could cause scheduling issues because conventions are booked years out, and the NFL schedule is released just months before the season.Former NBA Commissioner David Stern will make a key speech at the Global Gaming Expo next month in which he will present the case for legalizing sports betting, according to ESPN. Stern’s turnaround on sports betting lines him up with the views of current NBA commissioner Adam Silver who supports a federal framework of betting regulations. The NBA has a small stake in FanDuel (Private:DUEL) in what could be considered a bit of a hedge. Sports betting is slated to be a major focus of the Global Gaming Expo scheduled for September 26 September 29 at the Sands Expo. The Nevada Gaming Commission is also considering allowing remote wagering from all 50 states in what could be a major disruption to the industry if passed. Broadly related stocks: ISLE, PENN, PNK, BYD, GLPI, CHDN, MCRI, OTCQB:TPCA, CNTY, ERI, Knockoff Oakleys NYNY, DDE, UWN, FLL, CZR, CACQ, MGM, LVS, WYNN, DRAFT, DDAY, OTCPK:DTFSF, ZNGA, OTC:WIMHF, AYA, OTCPK:EIHDF, SGMS, OTCQB:GLXZ.With the Lions circling the drain, it only a matter of time before Jim Caldwell is given his pink slip. When that happens, expect Teryl Austin to be first in line to fill the vacancy. In his first year with the Lions in 2014, Austin was responsible for second best total defense in Cheap Jerseys the league. Losing Ndamukong Suh set Austin unit back, way back, but that was to be expected. Take into account that Austin has been a part of two Super Bowl teams, the 2009 Arizona Cardinals and the Super Bowl winning 2012 Baltimore Ravens, and the Lions would appear to have their next head coach already on the sidelines.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button